14/12/2013

BEWARE OF STEREOTYPICAL COUNCIL SPEAK

"I'm not in the habit of repeating myself!" "I said. I'm not in the habit of ..."!
On flicking through the chronological list of council press releases the other day, I came across a curious pattern of events.

The first press released I noticed was released on the 13th December 2013 and recalled the story of an Ashton man who’d claimed benefits to which he was not entitled, to which Cllr Jim Fitzpatrick, Tameside Council's first deputy (revenue and finance) was quoted as saying: "Although cases like this one are rare, and we will always explore every avenue possible, we will not hesitate to take people to court if that is what is required."

Looking back on a similar case which has been released a day earlier, again Cllr Jim Fitzpatrick, Tameside Council's first deputy (revenue and finance) said: "Although cases like this one are rare, and we will always explore every avenue possible, we will not hesitate to take people to court if that is what is required - and we always take steps to reclaim overpaid money."

Going further back, I found it had happened again on the 29th November, this time it appeared in a report about a Hyde woman who had received an 18-month conditional discharge for falsely claiming housing and council tax benefit.

Once again councillor was reported as saying: "Although such fraud cases are rare and we will always explore every avenue possible, we will not hesitate to take people to court if that is what is required, and we always take steps to reclaim overpaid money."

On the 9th October yet another story issued from the Town Hall told of a woman from Audenshaw who’d fraudulently claimed housing and council tax benefit. Once again gibbering Jim, Tameside Council’s first deputy (revenue and finance) had said: “Although fraud cases such as this one are rare, and we will always explore every avenue possible, we will not hesitate to take people to court if that is what is required."

And on going back to the 6th September, reporting on the conditional discharge of another benefits cheat from Denton, the press office once again reported that the council’s first deputy (revenue and finance) had maintained his continuous rhythmic mumbling of "Although such fraud cases are rare and we will always explore every avenue possible, we will not hesitate to take people to court if that is what is required, and we always take steps to reclaim overpaid money."

Now I don’t know about you, but if I was related to this gentleman and constantly witnessed this persistent verbigeration, I would feel extremely concerned for his health.

Alternatively, could it be that the personnel in Tameside's beleaguered press office; struggling to keep up with the habitual craving for publicity from an extremely unpopular bunch of civic chancers, simply prefer to ‘cut and paste’ their bosses mumbling's, in the belief that their press releases are only being read by egotistical councillors and the odd couple of members of an apathetic audience!


Sometimes; especially when one delves into the inner-workings of Tameside council, it is very difficult to distinguish between ‘deliberate and incompetent’ when so many of the positions of influence these days seem to have been deliberately populated by incompetents.

4 comments:

  1. This Councillor was caught red handed posting third party leaflets in Dukinfield
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WQLAAStLuW0

    ReplyDelete
  2. This Labour Councillor put details of my partners benefits on the internet, so I complained to the borough solicitors office.
    It's real nasty what these people do in the shadows when they think people are not aware to it.

    ReplyDelete
  3. If that was the case, Mr Anonymous,, it might be an idea to supply your proof to the borough solicitor, pointing out the general terms of contract covering serving councillors.
    It is as follows: As a serving councillor, you must not--
    (a) disclose information given to you in confidence by anyone, or information
    acquired by you which you believe, or ought reasonably to be aware, is
    of a confidential nature, except where--
    i you have the consent of a person authorised to give it;
    ii you are required by law to do so;
    iii the disclosure is made to a third party for the purpose of obtaining
    professional advice provided that the third party agrees not to disclose
    the information to any other person; or

    iv the disclosure is—

    (aa) reasonable and in the public interest; and
    (bb) made in good faith and in compliance with the reasonable
    requirements of the Authority; or
    (b) prevent another person from gaining access to information to which that
    person is entitled by law.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I have no faith in the borough solicitor she acts as legal aid for these fat cat Labour Cllrs.
    I've seen, and witnessed vile behaviour from these Labour Councillors at the election count.
    I've seen some of them drunk at the election count.
    Violence in the street, smear leaflets, all under the nose of the borough solicitor and the police.

    ReplyDelete

Please feel free to comment and express your views, all opinions are welcome but we will not post comments that contain abusive language or are deemed to be offensive or inflammatory.