"Would baby like a balloon, Madam? ...We've got a whole shadow cabinet full!" |
It was interesting to read in the Reporter that the local MP for Denton
& Reddish, Andrew Gwynne, has now become a ‘citizen scientist’ to help the
charity Cancer Research UK, fight cancer.
Now, Cancer Research UK is a laudable organisation and is
one of the country’s leading research organisations and one that has already
achieved multiple milestones in the fight against this terrible disease.
But on reading the article in which the prominent MP tells
us, “Research is cancers number one enemy, so I urge everyone to get involved
and help Cancer Research UK’s doctors and scientists to keep making huge
advances in the battle against all cancers.” makes one wonder if the Labour MP
has now made another U-turn on a principled stance he took previously.
Thanks to decades of dedicated research, survival from
cancer has doubled in the last 40 years, but this progress simply wouldn’t have
been possible without animal research.
Now, considering that Cancer Research UK, says that
“…research using animals is an unavoidable part of our efforts to beat cancer.”
One wonders how this practice conforms and suddenly becomes acceptable with Mr
Gwynne’s well publicised principles and his previous call for the banning of all research
which involves animal testing.
One wonders which hymn sheet he will be singing from when
the next piece of successful clinical research is revealed exposing the fact,
that fundamental to this particular breakthrough, it was at some stage, entirely due to
experiments being carried out on animals.
Admittedly, it is accepted that although a great deal of cancer research
is carried out without using animals. In certain areas, animal research remains
essential if researchers are to understand, prevent and cure cancer.
So it would be interesting to know whether Mr Gwynne has
accepted that animal experimentation has now somehow become acceptable, or
alternatively, whether he still advocates banning that part of the cancer
research program that involves biomedical tests on animals, before they are
tested on humans.
Personally, I suspect that like many politicians, my 'honourable friend’ has discovered that in order to spin his way up the political greasy pole, he has
to kiss a great many babies, whilst he’s actually stealing
their lollipops!
One also wonders whether his love of animals extends to opposing cruel methods of ritual animal slaughter?
ReplyDeleteHe's hardly likely to be against Kosher for instance given his former chairmanship of the LFI group.
ReplyDeleteSo needless cruelty and barbarism, like ritual slaughter, is OK (there are votes and other 'benefits' in it), but necessary scientific advancement is 'wrong'.
ReplyDeleteThe words hypocrisy, spinelessness and expediency spring to mind.