Someone once asked Tony Blair if there was anything he
regretted from his time in office, to which our former Prime Minister surprised
the interviewer by answering: ‘The Freedom of Information Act’.
One of the effects the ‘Freedom of Information Act’ (FOI)
enshrined, was to introduce a "general right of access" to information
held by all public bodies, subject to certain absolute exemptions where
disclosure was not deemed to be in the public interest.
However, in Tameside, the overriding principle of requiring the
council to publish their monthly spending data; supposedly to enable greater
transparency, greater engagement and greater efficiency by allowing inspection
by residents, appears to be a total anathema, and supposedly to minimise awkward scrutiny, Tameside bosses appear to have have
designed the format in which they chose to publish their monthly expenditure, in
the most user-unfriendly fashion; however when one persists and trawls through the
information, it’s quite enlightening to see that the practice of ‘throwing our
money at private sector consultants' in order to solve problems that could be resolved
internally by well-paid civil servants’ councillors and council bosses is
increasingly on the increase.
Take this for example, found under transactions made by the
council in October 2014.
Ref: 5174415 under the heading of Housing, Economic Growth,
Investment and Sustainability, a figure of £5,600
was paid to a company called PARKING
MATTERS LIMITED who proudly list Tameside Council as one of their valued
clients; - and who, according to their website are a specialist consultancy that
provides innovative advice on all matters related to parking; and speak of how
their ‘clients’ can rely on their expertise and consistent track record to
optimize the value of their parking assets!
In a nutshell, they advise property owners, local
authorities, developers and operators on how to realize the full potential of
their parking assets!
Now, forgive me, but on reading Tameside Council Leader
Kieran Quinn’s blog, dated November 10th 2014, he gave us the
impression that “it was because of feedback from residents, businesses and the shopping
public that the Council moved to significantly reduce the cost of car parking
in prime town centre car parks to make them even more attractive and affordable
for shoppers. This, he told us, “will of course support the local economy
and, in the run up to Christmas, should significantly benefit everyone.”
He went on to say, “Once in place, Tameside will have the
lowest tariffs for long stay car parking in Greater Manchester as well as being
one of the cheapest for short stay town centre parking.”
So, despite our leaders claims that this small effort to encourage
a few more people to fight to park, albeit more cheaply in our towns, came
about by “listening to what the public has to say” something, he tells
us,
“the council does on a constant basis” would now appear to be based on ‘paid
for’ consultative advice prepared by a private company! - Advice that thousands of
Tameside town centre retailers, shoppers and visitors could have told him for
free!
Could this be yet another example of ‘over-paid,
under-qualified, political square pegs that have been crammed into the council’s
round holes; or could it really be true that there is no one left within the
hallowed portico's of Tameside Town Hall who can sort out the boroughs car parks?
God help us!
This "leader" gets in addition to his "allowances" a sizeable sum from New Charter!!
ReplyDeleteI recall being in the council chamber when Cllr John Taylor lamented the £20,000 it cost to answer FoI requests. One wonders whether PARKING MATTERS LTD were the persons who recommended that Tameside give away car parks to New Charter to build on? While on the subject of building one wonders whether the council will take action against New Charter for building on a Sunday, in contravention of their planning permission?
ReplyDelete