I scanned the Tameside Reporter from cover to cover last
week, but alas; there’s been no sign of him!
Could it be he had nothing to preach? Or could it be
that he was attending the 87th birthday anniversary of his revolutionary hero Che Guevara?
Either way, I’m sure he’ll soon be back gracing the letters
page with more kernels of coprolite knowledge and frequent walks down memory lane which
he liberally spreads before us.
But, hang on, what is this? Page 11 of the Manchester Weekly
News has just been dropped on my lap and sure enough, there's a letter, ostensibly
flowing from the ubiquitous pen of ‘Baird of Dukkie’ concerning his chosen
subject ‘Litter’
Now, don’t get me wrong. I too deplore people who wantonly
discard their unwanted crap all over our streets, but reading the councillors letter,
one wonders whether he really wants littering to stop!
In his letter he claims that in Tameside they spend more
than £1million per year picking up after litter louts and was positively
drooling over the fact that the Government is to allow councils’ to increase
their fixed penalties for littering to £100.
Now here’s where the figures start to worry me. We already
know that this council is not what one could call numerate, and if proof was
needed, we’ve all heard claims from the councillor himself how he considers the
recent local election results to be ‘fair and democratic’ even though a vast number
of those entitled to vote, didn’t!
I would be interested to learn how the councillor arrives at
his assertion that littering costs Tameside council £1million per year! After
all, those that are paid to pick up litter in our streets are paid a set wage
to do the job. And they’ll get paid the same whether they pick up 1 ton or 20
tonnes of litter.
You’ve also got to question the wisdom of this career Labourite
councillor, when he declares that because of the ‘massive cuts’ that have been
imposed upon them, they have less enforcement officers to issue fines! Which is
a great example of typically backward politically biased economics.
No one in their right mind would contemplate cutting the
numbers of those who not only have the job of bringing in more money, but are
actively engaged in working towards building a cleaner and more attractive
environment which new businesses and those looking to put down family roots
might find attractive.
So, let’s look at his figures again.
With the £1million plus, he says it cost them, one could
employ 100 persons per year on £200 per week to pick up litter and I’m sure
Tameside don’t employ more than a dozen or so operatives, specifically for that
purpose.
It would make far more sense to double or even treble the
‘under-cover surveillance and enforcement officers’ in order to hand out more
fines to replenish the council’s coffers!
For instance, let’s assume each town within Tameside has 5 litter
enforcement officers who have a conservative target of finding 5 litter
droppers per day.
(Even I could catch more than 5 people dropping cigarette
butts, toffee wrappers, Food containers and all manner of other rubbish in a
day!)
At £100 handed out
for each fine, that’s £2500 per day, per town.
There are 9 towns: Ashton-u-Lyne, Audenshaw, Denton,
Droylsden, Dukinfield, Hyde, Longdendale, Mossley and Stalybridge which offers a
potential £22,500 per day.
Now let’s assume a 5 day working week; Tameside’s front line
heroes could be issuing £112,500 worth of fines for dropping litter per week.
Gross that up by 52 weeks and you get a staggering income of
over £5.85million!
So instead of littering ‘costing us money’ if those
responsible were in any way efficient; even if we assume it does cost over
£1million to finance the ‘litter squad’ they could be well over £4.5million per
year in profit.
Now just think how much they could knock of the Parking fees,
the Council Tax, Licensing fees for social events, and all the other underhand expenses
they subject us to over the course of the year or invest in schemes that
encourage businesses to flourish!
So you see why our intrepid councillor loves ‘litter’ so
much? The plain fact is he simply can’t afford for Tameside’s litter louts to
stop dropping it. Otherwise, instead of shovelling the political nonsense about
littering and paying lip-service to the problem and subjecting 'volunteers to grace his photo-opportunities, he would take off the kid
gloves and get ruthless!