According to the voting figures, 127 Tory MPs supported the
bill, 136 opposed it, and 40 MPs did not vote at all.
Let me just say, I am not religious and I have no issues
with gays getting ‘spliced’- Gay people pay taxes, obey the law like the rest of us and I don't see why they can't have complete equality
It’s the word ‘marriage’ that I find problematic and the fact that to make it possible for gays to be ‘married’ the Government would have to redefine the meaning of the word from its current definition.
It’s the word ‘marriage’ that I find problematic and the fact that to make it possible for gays to be ‘married’ the Government would have to redefine the meaning of the word from its current definition.
The Government and the bills supporters say ‘it’s all about
equality’ but in their cack-handed attempt to introduce 'equality' they have made it unequal for heterosexual couples! - How on earth can the bill be equal when it proposes that adultery
will not be grounds for divorce among same-sex couples? How can there be equal marriage without equal
divorce? Also, as it stands, same sex couples can enter into a civil
partnership. If the introduction of this bill is about equality, why was it not
included that heterosexual couples could be joined in civil partnerships too?
I also have a deep sense of resentment in the way that this
legislation has been muddled together and pushed through, without a mandate, despite knowing the internal
anger it would cause.
If this bill is not radically amended and scrutinised by ‘intelligent
legislators’ it will open a complete can of worms!
If Cameron is banking on the ‘pink vote’ increasing his
chances and the fact that Tory dissenters have nowhere else to go, in the 2015
election, I think he’s made a bad mistake.
Having
had my fill of the dismantling of the UK and its traditions, I am now 100% UKIP come 2015! In fact, I'd sooner vote for
Labour than Cameron.
For the first election ever I'll be actively hoping that the
current front bench of Tories get wiped out.
The only good thing that can possibly come out of this
unnecessary farce is if it crystallises a leadership challenge that proves
successful.
This was an ill-conceived bill for which there was no
political need coming at a time when every responsible politician, particularly
those in Government, should have their attention focused on the faltering
economy.
The sooner Mr Cameron goes the better.
Free speech needs champions in the face of political persecution from new charter housing.
ReplyDeleteNew Charter and the Tameside Reporter great day for fee speech?
Judge slams injunction as “Ridiculously wide” and a “significant breach of Freedom of speech”
A statement that is still ringing in their ears.
http://tamesidecitizen.blogspot.co.uk/2012/07/roy-wests-injunction-hearing-adjourned.html