According to the latest Press Release emanating from the Tameside
‘brains trust’ (The council) - in the face of on-going Government cuts, they are
now going to concentrate their resources on statutory functions and other
priority areas!
These they have prioritised as:
Disposal of under-utilised car parks and new charges introduced for others.
Stopping inspection of low and medium risk business premises
To consider to reduce further the costs of bin collections by collecting outside normal working hours.
Significantly reduce highway maintenance by dealing with high risk repairs only and stop local highway improvement schemes altogether
Stop routine maintenance and lighting checks and respond to complaints only
Review all fees and charges
Reducing our winter gritting programme so that we only cover priority routes
How about a piss-up in a brewery? |
Surely we should be arguing that land 'owned' by the council is no such thing - it belongs to the people and as such should be available for them to use as they wish - if that is for parking so be it.
The other measure to introduce ‘new charges’ for the other Car Parks, only offers yet another reason to shoppers to shop elsewhere!
As for stopping inspection of low and medium risk
business premises, well that is probably one of the factors which lie behind
the ‘horse meat’ scandal!
Thirdly, after introducing one of the most costly and confusing
refuse collection systems in the country; one which replaced a very successful ‘one
bin’ emptied ‘once a week’ by one vehicle with 3 men, with 4 bins, with two
sometimes three being emptied once a week by two or three vehicles with 6 or 9
men; someone, presumably the one with the council pencil and calculator, has
decided this is expensive and maybe there’s a better way to do it!
Next, the announcement of significantly reduce highway
maintenance by dealing with high risk repairs only and stop local highway
improvement schemes altogether, hopefully means that they will stop creating
hundreds of ‘traffic calming islands and pink pavements, together with the practice
of sending round a man with a can of spray paint to put marks around the
pot-hole’ in question, followed some weeks later by a couple of bods in a lorry
who tip a pit of tarmac in the hole and stamp it down with their hobnails, followed
some weeks later by 4 bods who dig out what’s left of the tarmac, clean the
hole (which is now twice the size of the original pot-hole, fill it with more
tarmac and complete it with a mechanical compactor.
At last, someone must have realised that by employing
fill-it, botch-it and scarper; pothole patching will end up costing them much
more in the long run!
Now as for stopping routine lighting checks, this could
have been sorted years ago when the council were presented with a simple
computerised system that remotely checked the condition/longevity of lighting luminaires,
but preferred to continue with the old method of sending two men in a van (on overtime
rates, because to check lighting it has to be dark!) around the borough,
visually checking street lights!
Reviewing all fees and charges, means all fee and charges
will go up!
And finally, to reduce the winter gritting programme to
only cover priority routes. Well that all depends on whose priority they mean!
Personally, simply stopping wasting money on ego boosting
vanity projects like the killing of Hyde Market by throwing £1.3million
reducing the market to a mere handful of stalls, might go along way.
Also, wasting £36,000 on a virtual Town hall’ which had to be
scrapped! Or the totally unnecessary insistence, on moving of a War Memorial 35metres
costing another £75,000 and in spite of massive local resistance.
Then there's spending £14million on a low priority road to nowhere and another
£1800 entering the council’s Northern Bypass road scheme for initial
consideration for recognition in the Considerate Constructor Award scheme! Not
to mention the extra cost of sending God knows how many dignitaries to the
awards gala dinner!
In
fact it makes one wonder if the council has any feelings at all for the town of
Ashton; there can’t be many towns in the country whose council seems so desperate
to keep people out of the town centre that they are not only contemplating selling off
the central car parks, but they have now built 2 bypasses to encourage travellers to circumvent our shops and keep
on going to other towns!
But, despite these newly announced cuts to services, they announced last
week that they are spending £4.5million reducing the amount of stalls, remodelling the market
square and building themselves a state-of-the-art new council office block, to which, I feel sure, people will flock to from miles!
Our Labour councillors seem to have a very weird idea of us
all being in this together! - God help us!
"They" might not be able to organise the proverbial, but they know how to look after their friends.
ReplyDeleteCheck:-
http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&sqi=2&ved=0CC8QFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tameside.gov.uk%2Fkeydecisions%2Fcoordination%2F220206.pdf&ei=s1ArUd_tOceQhQfovIGYBQ&usg=AFQjCNHA9INdgpLHaGC2TVVQROHg4UpEcA
Shortly after her ACCESS homecare got the Tameside contract Shirlie Traynor (formerly labour councillor Shirlie Stonier) sold out to CARE UK for an undisclosed sum. At the same time Care Uk bought out TWO oter companies paying £10m for all three.
Being awarded a council contract by her successor must have helped her deal with Uk Care, surely?