Understandable perhaps, but what I can’t understand is why,
when MPs and councillors are asked direct questions or criticised; especially
when the readers’ comments are generally in response to matters initially
raised by the councillors themselves, then more often or not, answers come
there none!
If it’s the case that some councillors are not sufficiently
erudite to confidently correspond comprehensively, surely they could find a
qualified wordsmith from the council’s communications department to answer on
their behalf. After all, it wouldn’t be the first time that a council member
had called on their ‘ghost writers’ to bandy words with difficult, scholarly and
discursive critics!
The result may not produce satisfactory answers; debate may
not proceed productively; admittedly, debating though brutally edited copy can
at times be unintelligent. Letters get started and then meander to ramblings;
others engage in all manner of rhetorical tactics to deflect awkward
interlocutors. But even on those occasions, when we are forced to decipher
questionable standards of grammar; this would be preferable to silence, or
simply being ignored as a way of obfuscation.
Last week, in Cllr Taylor’s weekly letter to the Ashtonians,
paragraph 1, verse 1, he told us he was looking at some old photographs. Well with
the greatest of respects, maybe his time would be better spent if put his old
photo’s back in the drawer, took out his biro, and answered a few questions
that refer to matters raised today - and do it personally! – After all, we’ve never seen
him send an assistant or a 'stand-in' to a photo’ op, have we?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please feel free to comment and express your views, all opinions are welcome but we will not post comments that contain abusive language or are deemed to be offensive or inflammatory.